The All India Football Federation (AIFF) is currently awaiting a formal response from the Asian Football Confederation (AFC) regarding the eligibility of Indian Super League (ISL) clubs for the AFC Champions League 2, amid concerns over a potentially shortened ISL season. The uncertainty has raised questions about whether Indian clubs will meet the minimum match requirements mandated by AFC regulations.
According to existing AFC competition rules, clubs must play at least 24 domestic league matches in a season to qualify for continental tournaments such as the AFC Champions League 2. However, ongoing operational challenges have cast doubt on whether the ISL will be able to complete a full-length season with the required number of fixtures.
In recent meetings involving AIFF officials and ISL club representatives, discussions were held on possible structural adjustments to the league. These include centralising the season at limited venues to manage logistical issues, as well as exploring alternative competition formats to ensure the league is completed within a feasible timeframe. The AIFF has formally communicated these concerns to the AFC and sought clarity on whether any flexibility can be granted under the current circumstances.
Sources indicate that AIFF is keen to ensure Indian clubs do not miss out on continental participation, as exposure in AFC competitions is considered crucial for the growth of Indian football. Participation in tournaments like the AFC Champions League 2 provides clubs with international experience, commercial opportunities, and higher competitive standards.
In parallel, discussions among ISL stakeholders have also touched upon long-term reforms in Indian football. Proposals include the gradual introduction of promotion and relegation, which would align Indian football more closely with global league systems. While these changes are part of a broader roadmap, immediate focus remains on completing the current season without compromising AFC eligibility.
The possibility of hosting matches at centralised venues has been considered as a practical solution to reduce travel and operational costs. This model has been used successfully in previous seasons under exceptional circumstances. However, even with such measures, meeting the 24-match threshold remains a challenge if the season calendar is significantly compressed.
AIFF officials have maintained that they are in constant communication with the AFC and are hopeful of a favourable resolution. They have stressed that any decision will be taken in the best interests of Indian football, ensuring compliance with international standards while addressing domestic constraints.
A final decision from the AFC is expected in the coming weeks. Until then, ISL clubs and administrators remain in a wait-and-watch mode, as the outcome will determine India’s representation in Asian club competitions next season. The response from the AFC will play a key role in shaping not only the current ISL campaign but also the future planning of domestic football competitions in the country.
