Former India captain Kris Srikkanth has launched a strong criticism of the Indian team management over its decision to leave young batting sensation Vaibhav Sooryavanshi out of the playing XI during the final two T20I matches against New Zealand. Describing the decision as foolish, Srikkanth said the management was not providing the teenager with the consistent opportunities needed to develop at the international level.
His comments have renewed the debate over India's handling of young players and the frequent changes in the team's opening combination. Srikkanth believes that repeatedly selecting and dropping players without giving them a clear role can create an insecure atmosphere within the dressing room.
India Today+1
Srikkanth questions the decision
India decided to retain its batting combination for the final T20I against New Zealand in Hamilton, even though the series result had already been decided. While changes were made to the bowling combination, Sooryavanshi was once again left out of the playing XI.
The 15-year-old had featured in two earlier matches in the series when Ishan Kishan was unavailable due to an injury concern. However, he did not get an opportunity in the final two games.
Srikkanth questioned why India did not use the remaining matches to give the youngster more international experience. According to him, the team management should have provided a clear plan to its three opening options rather than changing the combination repeatedly.
Speaking on his YouTube channel, the former India captain said the team should give Sooryavanshi a proper run and explain how many matches each opener would get. He argued that such clarity would help players understand their roles and prepare without worrying about being dropped after a single unsuccessful performance.
Warning about an insecure atmosphere
Srikkanth's criticism was not limited to Sooryavanshi's exclusion from one match. He expressed concern about the impact of frequent selection changes on the confidence of young players.
He believes that a player who is repeatedly included and then left out may begin to question his position in the team. Such uncertainty could affect a youngster's approach and prevent him from playing with freedom.
Srikkanth said the management should encourage Sooryavanshi rather than discourage him by keeping him on the sidelines. He also described the decision to bench the teenager as foolishness, arguing that the team was missing an opportunity to groom a promising young batter.
The former cricketer further suggested that Sanju Samson should also be given a clear role. Instead of giving each opener occasional opportunities, he believes the management should establish a fair rotation system or provide one player with an extended run.
India Today+1
Sooryavanshi's performances under discussion
Vaibhav Sooryavanshi has attracted considerable attention through his performances in domestic and franchise cricket. His aggressive batting approach and ability to score quickly have made him one of the most discussed young prospects in Indian cricket.
According to reports, he scored 776 runs during the IPL season, establishing himself as a major batting prospect. His performances helped him earn opportunities in India's T20I setup.
Srikkanth believes the teenager has demonstrated his ability at multiple levels and deserves a sustained opportunity to prove himself in international cricket. He has also suggested that Sooryavanshi should be considered for India's ODI setup because of his batting potential.
However, being a talented young player does not automatically guarantee a permanent place in the playing XI. The selection debate centres on whether the management should give him a longer opportunity to assess his performance or continue rotating him with experienced players.
India Today+1
Opening combination remains a challenge
India's opening combination has been a subject of discussion, particularly with the availability of Abhishek Sharma, Sanju Samson and Vaibhav Sooryavanshi.
Each player brings a different experience and batting style to the team. Samson has international experience, while Abhishek has established himself as an attacking T20 batter. Sooryavanshi represents a younger option with considerable potential.
Managing three opening options can be challenging when the team has only two places available at the top of the order. However, Srikkanth believes that the management must communicate its plans clearly so that players understand when they will get opportunities.
His suggestion is to avoid repeatedly changing the combination without a clear explanation. A planned rotation system, in his view, could help maintain confidence and give every player a reasonable opportunity to demonstrate his ability.
Debate over India's player development approach
Srikkanth's remarks have added to the wider discussion about how India should develop young international cricketers. Young players often need time to adjust to international competition, and consistent opportunities can help them understand the demands of the highest level.
At the same time, team selection involves several factors, including current form, opposition, match conditions and the balance of the playing XI. The management has to consider these aspects before deciding on the final eleven.
There has been no indication in the cited reports that the Indian team management has formally responded to Srikkanth's latest criticism.
The debate now centres on whether Sooryavanshi will receive a longer opportunity in India's upcoming T20I assignments. For Srikkanth, the priority is clear: talented youngsters should be encouraged through a defined role and consistent opportunities rather than being left uncertain about their place in the team.
