Samajwadi Party president Akhilesh Yadav has launched a strong attack on the BJP led central government over the recently announced India US trade deal, raising concerns about its potential impact on domestic industries and livelihoods. Speaking in Lucknow, the former Uttar Pradesh chief minister alleged that the agreement prioritises foreign interests over local producers and undermines the government’s Make in India initiative.
Akhilesh Yadav claimed that the trade deal would open Indian markets further to American products, placing domestic manufacturers and farmers at a disadvantage. He argued that instead of strengthening local production, the government was allowing imports to increase, which could weaken India’s economic self reliance. According to him, such policies contradict the stated objective of promoting indigenous manufacturing and innovation.
The Samajwadi Party leader specifically questioned the decision to import animal feed and related products. He pointed out that Indian agricultural institutions and researchers have already developed locally suitable alternatives. Yadav said relying on imports despite available domestic solutions raises serious questions about the government’s priorities and planning.
Highlighting the social impact of the trade agreement, Yadav stated that the consequences would be felt most strongly by backward classes and Dalit communities engaged in dairy farming and allied sectors. He argued that increased imports could reduce demand for locally produced goods, affecting income levels and employment opportunities in rural areas.
Yadav also accused the central government of failing to consult stakeholders before finalising such agreements. He stressed that farmers, small scale producers, and cooperative institutions should be involved in policy decisions that directly affect their livelihoods. According to him, ignoring these voices could widen economic inequality and deepen distress in the agricultural sector.
The Samajwadi Party chief reiterated that international trade agreements should be designed to protect national interests and strengthen domestic capacity. He maintained that while global cooperation is important, it should not come at the cost of local industries and traditional occupations. Yadav called for a detailed review of the trade deal and demanded transparency regarding its long term implications.
Responding to criticism from opposition parties, the central government has maintained that the India US trade agreement aims to expand export opportunities, attract investment, and boost economic growth. Government representatives have stated that such agreements are essential for integrating India into global supply chains and enhancing competitiveness.
Political analysts note that the trade deal has become a key point of debate between the ruling party and the opposition. While the government presents it as an opportunity for growth and global integration, opposition leaders like Akhilesh Yadav view it as a threat to domestic production and employment.
As discussions around the trade agreement continue, the issue is expected to remain a prominent topic in political discourse. The debate reflects broader concerns about balancing global trade partnerships with the need to protect local industries and vulnerable communities.
