With the 2026 West Bengal Assembly elections approaching, political rhetoric in the state has once again turned to allegations of covert arrangements between rival parties, popularly referred to as “setting”. The term has long been part of Bengal’s political vocabulary and is often invoked during election cycles to question the credibility of opponents.
In recent weeks, leaders from the All India Trinamool Congress and the Bharatiya Janata Party have traded accusations suggesting that their rivals are engaged in secret understandings aimed at influencing electoral results. These claims, though not supported by newly disclosed documentary evidence, have gained attention at campaign rallies and media briefings.
The word “setting” is commonly used in the state to describe alleged behind-the-scenes political cooperation between parties that publicly position themselves as adversaries. In previous election cycles, similar allegations have surfaced, often in connection with shifting political alliances or investigations involving political leaders. While the accusations may not always lead to formal complaints or legal action, they tend to influence public perception and media narratives.
Political analysts say that such allegations are strategically deployed to consolidate voter bases and cast doubt on opponents’ integrity. By suggesting covert collaboration, parties attempt to frame rivals as untrustworthy or opportunistic. This strategy is particularly relevant in closely contested constituencies, where even minor shifts in voter sentiment can affect outcomes.
West Bengal has witnessed intense political competition over the past decade, with the All India Trinamool Congress retaining power while the Bharatiya Janata Party has expanded its presence. Against this backdrop, campaign narratives often revolve around corruption allegations, investigative proceedings, and claims of political manipulation. The revival of the “setting” narrative fits within this broader pattern of confrontational campaigning.
Observers note that while such rhetoric energises party supporters, it can also deepen political polarisation. Voters are exposed to competing claims, making it difficult to separate substantiated allegations from political messaging. As of now, no official confirmation from investigative agencies has directly validated the fresh round of “setting” accusations tied specifically to the 2026 election campaign.
Election strategists believe that as the polling schedule draws nearer, campaign messaging will intensify, and allegations of secret deals may become more frequent. Parties are expected to use public meetings, social media outreach, and televised debates to reinforce their positions.
Ultimately, the impact of these allegations will depend on how voters interpret them. While some may view the claims as routine political rhetoric, others could see them as indicative of deeper political manoeuvring. With several months remaining before the Assembly polls, the discourse surrounding alleged covert understandings is likely to remain a prominent feature of West Bengal’s political landscape.
