The central government has intensified its criticism of opposition-led states, accusing them of not fully cooperating with the implementation of the PM Schools for Rising India (PM SHRI) scheme. The initiative, launched to upgrade and modernize schools across the country, has faced resistance in some states, leading to political friction between the Centre and state governments.
According to government officials, certain states governed by opposition parties have not signed the necessary agreements or provided timely approvals, delaying the scheme’s execution. They argue that the lack of participation from these states is depriving students of improved educational infrastructure, smart classrooms, and enhanced learning resources. The Centre has urged state governments to set aside political differences and prioritize students’ future by ensuring smooth implementation of the scheme.
However, opposition leaders have strongly refuted these claims, alleging that the Centre is selectively targeting non-BJP-ruled states. They argue that the PM SHRI scheme has been designed in a way that limits state autonomy, forcing them to comply with central directives rather than allowing flexibility in implementation. Some states have also expressed concerns over the funding structure, stating that it puts an additional financial burden on state governments.
The PM SHRI scheme aims to upgrade 14,500 schools across India, transforming them into model institutions with modern amenities, experiential learning approaches, and sustainability practices. It is intended to set a benchmark for quality education and inspire other schools to adopt innovative teaching methods.
Education experts warn that continued political disputes could impact students’ access to better learning opportunities. They emphasize the need for collaboration between the Centre and states to ensure effective policy implementation without political interference.
As tensions escalate, discussions between central and state education authorities remain crucial in resolving disagreements and ensuring that students across all regions benefit from the scheme as originally envisioned. The coming weeks will determine whether a consensus can be reached or if political differences will continue to hinder progress.
