Chennai, August 4, 2025 – Tamil Nadu Chief Minister M K Stalin has come out strongly in support of West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee, following a controversy over a Delhi Police communication that allegedly described the Bengali language in a dismissive manner. The letter, which reportedly labeled Bengali as an incomprehensible or difficult language, sparked political outrage and public condemnation.
Reacting to the issue, Stalin condemned the statement, calling it not only unacceptable but also an insult to the language in which India’s National Anthem is written. He asserted that such comments are deeply hurtful and reflect a disregard for the constitutional values of linguistic equality and cultural respect.
In a post on social media and during a press interaction, Stalin said, “Bengali is one of the great languages of India, rich in literature, history, and national identity. To speak of it in such terms is to insult not just a state, but the spirit of India’s unity in diversity.” He further added that the National Anthem, Jana Gana Mana, penned by Rabindranath Tagore in Bengali, stands as a symbol of the country's shared heritage.
Stalin, who has consistently advocated for federalism and linguistic rights, emphasized that attempts to belittle or undermine regional languages must be confronted. He said such tendencies erode the pluralistic foundation of the Indian Republic and called on authorities to take appropriate action against those responsible for the offensive content in the letter.
Mamata Banerjee had earlier criticized the Delhi Police, calling the communication “an insult to Bengal and Bengalis.” She demanded an apology and clarification from the Union Home Ministry. Her statement triggered widespread reactions from leaders across party lines, with several political figures from regional parties expressing solidarity with her stance.
Stalin’s support comes at a time when debates over language policy, regional identity, and central-state relations continue to make headlines across India. Tamil Nadu, in particular, has long maintained a position of opposition to imposed uniformity in language and culture, advocating for recognition and respect for India’s linguistic diversity.
Political analysts note that this controversy may influence broader conversations on how India balances its many languages and cultures within the framework of national unity. The remarks by Stalin are seen not only as political support but also as part of a continuing narrative that demands greater sensitivity and inclusiveness from institutions of governance.
No official statement has yet been issued by the Delhi Police regarding the content of the letter, though calls for explanation and accountability are growing. As the matter gains national attention, many civil society groups and cultural organizations have joined in condemning the alleged remark.
The incident has once again highlighted the importance of promoting mutual respect among India’s linguistic communities, and the political momentum now points toward stronger efforts to protect and celebrate regional languages as essential elements of national identity.
