The Shiv Sena (Uddhav Balasaheb Thackeray faction) and Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS) have voiced strong objections to the proposed inclusion of Hindi as a compulsory third language in the primary school curriculum across Maharashtra. The move, being considered by the state education department, has sparked a fresh political debate over language, regional identity, and cultural autonomy.
Both regional parties expressed concern that prioritizing Hindi in primary education undermines the prominence of Marathi—the state’s official language—and threatens the linguistic diversity that defines Maharashtra's educational and cultural landscape.
Shiv Sena (UBT) spokesperson Sanjay Raut said, “We are not against any language, but imposing Hindi through the education system is unacceptable. Marathi must remain at the heart of learning in Maharashtra. Decisions like these must reflect the sentiments of the local people, not political pressures from the Centre.”
Echoing similar sentiments, MNS leader Amit Thackeray warned that any move perceived as a form of “linguistic imposition” would face statewide opposition. “We respect all Indian languages, but Maharashtra has its own rich heritage and Marathi identity. Introducing Hindi in a compulsory way at the primary level is not acceptable,” he stated.
Currently, the three-language formula followed in many Indian states includes the regional language, English, and an additional Indian language—usually Hindi in non-Hindi-speaking states. The debate arises from a recommendation that Hindi be made a mandatory part of early education to promote national integration and language familiarity.
However, critics argue that this policy can be culturally intrusive, especially in states like Maharashtra where regional identity and pride in the Marathi language run deep. Educationists also question the practical aspects of implementation and the impact on students already managing two languages—Marathi and English.
Meanwhile, the state education department has clarified that the proposal is still under review and that no final decision has been taken. A senior official stated that consultations with stakeholders, including language experts, educators, and political leaders, would take place before moving forward.
The controversy has reignited discussions about language policy in schools and the fine balance between national integration and regional autonomy. With elections looming in several local bodies and the Lok Sabha in sight, language politics is once again at the forefront of public discourse in Maharashtra.
As the debate continues, all eyes remain on the Maharashtra government’s next move, as it navigates public sentiment, political alliances, and constitutional guidelines on education and language.
