°C
Air:
GOLD—
SILVER—
USD—
EUR—
GBP—
Six Years After Article 370 Abrogation, Calls for Statehood in Jammu and Kashmir Grow Stronger
Lok Sabha

Six Years After Article 370 Abrogation, Calls for Statehood in Jammu and Kashmir Grow Stronger

0.0 views
Text Size:

Many believe that sustained growth and peace in Jammu and Kashmir are linked to stable governance and political accountability, which only an elected government can provide.

August marks six years since the central government revoked Article 370, ending the special constitutional status of Jammu and Kashmir and bifurcating the former state into two union territories. As this politically significant date approaches, voices demanding the restoration of full statehood have grown louder across the region.

Political parties, civil society organisations, and local residents have increasingly expressed concern over the prolonged absence of an elected government. They argue that governance through a centrally appointed administration limits public participation and does not reflect the democratic aspirations of the people. The demand for early assembly elections and restoration of statehood has been echoed in political rallies, public meetings, and statements from key regional leaders.

Former Chief Ministers, including leaders from the National Conference and the Peoples Democratic Party, have reiterated their stand that the people of Jammu and Kashmir must be given back their democratic rights. They believe that the region’s political identity and administrative autonomy have been undermined since the abrogation of Article 370 in 2019. While some parties have focused on legal and constitutional challenges to the move, others are now prioritising the call for immediate elections and reinstatement of statehood.

The central government, on its part, has maintained that development and security in Jammu and Kashmir have improved since the revocation of Article 370. It cites increased infrastructure spending, higher tourist inflow, and a reduction in militant incidents as indicators of progress. However, critics argue that these changes do not substitute for democratic governance and that administrative decisions without local representation lack legitimacy and public trust.

Civil society organisations have also joined the growing demand for statehood. Several forums and advocacy groups have pointed out that the absence of a locally elected legislative assembly is a setback for democratic values in a region with a unique political history. Young voters, especially those who have come of age since 2019, have voiced a desire to participate in shaping their future through electoral processes.

The business community and professionals in the region have added their voices to the call for political normalcy. Many believe that sustained growth and peace in Jammu and Kashmir are linked to stable governance and political accountability, which only an elected government can provide.

Analysts note that while the abrogation of Article 370 was a major constitutional change, the delay in holding elections and restoring statehood has led to political uncertainty. They warn that without addressing the democratic deficit, long-term stability in the region may remain elusive.

As the Union Territory completes six years under direct central rule, all eyes are on the central government to see if it announces a concrete timeline for restoring statehood. Until then, the calls for democratic restoration are likely to intensify, making it a central issue in the political discourse of Jammu and Kashmir. 

The demand for early assembly elections and restoration of statehood has been echoed in political rallies, public meetings, and statements from key regional leaders.