Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) leader and former Bihar Deputy Chief Minister Tejashwi Yadav has launched a scathing attack on the central government over the introduction of the Constitution (130th Amendment) Bill in Parliament. Speaking to reporters, Yadav alleged that the Bill was not framed with the intention of strengthening governance but instead was brought in as a tool to blackmail states and political parties opposing the ruling dispensation.
According to Yadav, the proposed amendment undermines the spirit of federalism, which is a fundamental aspect of the Indian Constitution. He argued that by centralizing powers and weakening state autonomy, the Bill threatens the balance of governance and democratic values. “This Bill is not about reform. It is about creating pressure on states and using it as a weapon to blackmail political opponents,” he stated.
The RJD leader further claimed that the central government has consistently attempted to divert attention from real issues faced by citizens, including unemployment, rising inflation, and declining investment in welfare schemes. He criticized the government for focusing on constitutional changes rather than addressing challenges that directly impact the lives of common people. Yadav also accused the Centre of using constitutional amendments selectively to benefit its political interests while ignoring the concerns of marginalized sections of society.
The Constitution (130th Amendment) Bill has already triggered sharp reactions across political circles, with several opposition parties expressing reservations. Many argue that the Bill’s provisions may lead to excessive central control and weaken the powers of elected state governments. Opposition leaders have demanded greater debate and transparency before any decision is made on its implementation.
Defending the Bill, central ministers argued that the amendment is aimed at strengthening administrative systems and ensuring uniformity in governance across the country. They maintained that it will streamline processes and eliminate inconsistencies that arise from different state-level practices. The government has also dismissed claims of political motivation, insisting that the Bill is a necessary step for modernizing governance structures.
Observers believe that the controversy surrounding the Bill could become a major flashpoint between the Centre and opposition parties in the upcoming parliamentary sessions. With states already expressing concerns about shrinking autonomy and financial independence, the Bill may deepen the ongoing debate about the balance of power between the Union and the states.
Tejashwi Yadav’s remarks highlight the larger opposition strategy of challenging the government on issues of federalism and democratic principles. The RJD, along with other parties, is expected to raise the matter in Parliament and demand detailed scrutiny through committees before the Bill moves forward.
As discussions continue, the Constitution (130th Amendment) Bill has emerged as a politically charged issue. Its fate will depend on the intensity of opposition within and outside Parliament, as well as the Centre’s ability to build consensus around its objectives.
