In a dramatic 12-hour session, the Rajya Sabha passed the Waqf (Amendment) Bill, with 128 votes in favour, 95 against, and no abstentions. The prolonged debate witnessed fiery exchanges between the ruling party and the opposition, with both sides presenting strong arguments regarding the bill’s implications on property rights and religious freedom.
The Waqf (Amendment) Bill aims to make key changes to the existing Waqf Act, which governs the administration of Waqf properties—land and assets dedicated to religious or charitable purposes in the Muslim community. The government has stated that the amendments are designed to bring greater transparency, accountability, and administrative efficiency in the functioning of Waqf Boards.
However, the bill’s passage has been met with strong opposition. Leaders from the Congress, TMC, Left parties, and AIMIM argued that the bill was introduced without adequate consultation and could lead to the arbitrary takeover of private or disputed properties. Some members alleged that the amendments infringe on property rights and may violate constitutional safeguards for minorities.
Union Minister for Minority Affairs, while presenting the bill, assured that the amendments would not impact the religious freedom or land rights of any individual or community. The Minister emphasized that the purpose of the bill is to curb corruption, prevent illegal encroachments, and ensure proper utilization of Waqf properties for the intended beneficiaries.
Opposition parties, however, were not convinced and walked out in protest after their amendments were rejected. Many leaders expressed concerns over the "speed and manner" in which the bill was passed without sending it to a select committee for review.
The passage of the bill now clears the way for its implementation, pending Presidential assent. Political analysts expect legal challenges to follow, with several parties preparing to move the Supreme Court on constitutional grounds.
