°C
Air:
GOLD—
SILVER—
USD—
EUR—
GBP—
Chinese AI Companies Rush to Secure Nvidia Chips Overseas Amid Fears of Tighter US Export Restrictions
AI News

Chinese AI Companies Rush to Secure Nvidia Chips Overseas Amid Fears of Tighter US Export Restrictions

0 views
Text Size:

Impact on the Global AI and Semiconductor Industry The developments highlight how US-China technology tensions are influencing the global artificial intelligence industry.

Chinese artificial intelligence companies are making efforts to secure access to Nvidia-powered computing resources at overseas data centres amid growing concerns that the United States could introduce stricter restrictions on advanced semiconductor technology. The move comes as Washington continues to limit China's access to some of the world's most powerful AI processors.

According to a Reuters report published on November 12, 2026, several Chinese technology companies are exploring ways to reserve computing capacity outside China before potential regulatory changes make such access more difficult. The development highlights the growing importance of overseas cloud infrastructure in the global competition for artificial intelligence technology.

The companies are concerned that political and regulatory developments in the United States could close an existing route through which Chinese AI developers access advanced Nvidia processors remotely.



Chinese AI Companies Seek Overseas Nvidia Computing Capacity

Reuters reported, citing three people familiar with the matter, that Chinese AI companies are attempting to rent computing capacity powered by Nvidia chips at data centres located outside China.

A major Chinese cloud service provider has reportedly discussed internally whether to secure overseas Nvidia computing resources. Some other companies have also contacted data centre operators to enquire about reserving capacity.

Smaller AI development companies are considering similar arrangements. According to the people cited by Reuters, some of these firms have explored options with major providers of rented computing power in Southeast Asia.

The companies involved have not been publicly identified in the report. Reuters also did not disclose the exact number of chips, computing capacity, contract values or locations involved in the discussions.

The reported activity suggests that Chinese AI companies are trying to reduce the risk of losing access to high-performance computing resources if Washington introduces additional restrictions.

Why Nvidia Chips Are Important for China's AI Industry

Nvidia is one of the world's leading suppliers of graphics processing units used in artificial intelligence development. Its advanced processors are widely used to train and operate large language models, generative AI applications, chatbots and other complex computing systems.

Developing advanced AI models requires substantial computing power. High-performance GPUs help companies process enormous volumes of data and perform the calculations needed to train sophisticated AI systems.

For Chinese technology companies, access to advanced processors has become an important issue because of US export restrictions. Washington has imposed controls on the sale and export of certain high-end Nvidia AI chips to China, citing national security and technology concerns.

These restrictions have encouraged Chinese companies to explore alternative sources of computing power. One option is to rent access to Nvidia-powered servers at data centres located in other countries rather than directly importing the processors into China.

This arrangement allows companies to use computing resources remotely while the physical hardware remains overseas. However, the legal position depends on the applicable export-control rules, the companies involved and the nature of the transactions.


Proposed US Law Raises Concerns Over Remote Chip Access

One of the major concerns among Chinese AI companies is the proposed Remote Access Security Act, commonly known as RASA.

The legislation would give the US Commerce Department greater authority to regulate remote and cloud-based access to advanced technologies that are subject to export restrictions.

The US House of Representatives passed the bill in January 2026 with 369 votes in favour and 22 against. However, it is still awaiting action in the Senate.

If the legislation becomes law, US authorities could gain additional powers to oversee how restricted computing technologies are accessed through overseas data centres and cloud service providers.

This could have significant implications for Chinese companies that depend on rented computing capacity outside their home country. Businesses that currently access advanced Nvidia processors through overseas infrastructure may need to reassess their arrangements if new regulations are introduced.

The possibility of tighter controls is reportedly one of the reasons companies are exploring capacity reservations now. However, the proposed legislation has not yet completed the legislative process, and its final provisions and implementation remain uncertain.



Jensen Huang Controversy Adds to Regulatory Uncertainty

The developments are also taking place amid controversy involving Nvidia Chief Executive Jensen Huang.

Reuters reported that Huang recently acknowledged being unfaithful to his wife. Separately, The New York Times reported that the woman involved was Alice Huang, a former executive at Singapore-based cloud computing company Megaspeed, and alleged that US authorities had concluded she was a Chinese intelligence asset.

Reuters said it could not independently verify the intelligence-related allegation. China has denied it. Jensen Huang and Alice Huang are not related.

The controversy has attracted attention because Megaspeed has faced scrutiny from US authorities over suspicions that it helped Chinese customers obtain advanced Nvidia chips subject to export controls.

Megaspeed has denied illegally diverting chips to China. In a statement reported by Reuters, the company said it had cooperated with inspections by the US Commerce Department's Bureau of Industry and Security. It also said it had appointed a US law firm to conduct an independent review of its graphics processing units and export-control compliance practices.

The allegations have added to concerns about whether Washington could take a stricter approach to overseas access to advanced AI processors. However, there is no confirmed evidence that the personal controversy involving Huang itself has directly caused a change in US export policy.



Grey-Market Demand for Nvidia Chips Also Increases

Concerns about tighter enforcement have reportedly affected China's unofficial market for advanced Nvidia processors.

According to people cited by Reuters, traders and intermediaries have started stockpiling restricted AI chips in anticipation of a possible crackdown on the movement of advanced processors and AI servers into China.

The report also highlighted a purchase involving Nvidia's H200 AI processors. Procurement records reportedly showed that a Chinese university with links to the People's Liberation Army purchased H200 chips despite being on a US export blacklist.

The development has raised questions about the effectiveness of existing export restrictions and the challenges involved in monitoring the international movement of advanced computing equipment.

Separately, US prosecutors have charged Super Micro Computer co-founder Yih-Shyan Wally Liaw and two other individuals over an alleged scheme to divert servers containing Nvidia processors to China through a company based in Southeast Asia.

Prosecutors alleged that approximately 2.5 billion dollars' worth of servers were purchased from Super Micro between 2024 and 2025, with a substantial portion allegedly diverted to China. The defendants have not been convicted, and the allegations remain subject to legal proceedings.



Impact on the Global AI and Semiconductor Industry

The developments highlight how US-China technology tensions are influencing the global artificial intelligence industry.

For Chinese AI developers, access to advanced processors is important for competing with international technology companies. Any additional restrictions on overseas cloud computing could increase operating costs and make it harder for these businesses to train and operate advanced AI models.

Overseas data centre operators may also face greater regulatory responsibilities if Washington expands its oversight of remote access to restricted technologies.

The issue could affect semiconductor suppliers, cloud computing companies and businesses investing in large-scale AI infrastructure across Asia. Southeast Asia may attract particular attention because some companies are reportedly exploring computing services in the region.

For Nvidia, the situation adds another layer of uncertainty around its business in China and the wider international market. The company remains a major supplier of AI processors, but its ability to serve different markets is influenced by government export policies.

What Happens Next?

Chinese AI companies are reportedly trying to secure overseas computing capacity while the US legislative and regulatory situation remains uncertain.

The next important development will be the US Senate's consideration of the Remote Access Security Act. Any progress on the bill could provide a clearer indication of how Washington intends to regulate access to advanced AI processors through overseas cloud services.

For now, the reported reservations and discussions do not establish that all Chinese AI companies have secured long-term computing contracts. The identities of the companies, the scale of the capacity involved and the final impact of any proposed restrictions remain unclear.

The situation demonstrates how access to advanced AI chips has become a central issue in the technology competition between the United States and China. Any change in export-control policy could have consequences not only for Chinese AI developers but also for international data centre operators and the wider semiconductor industry.

The company remains a major supplier of AI processors, but its ability to serve different markets is influenced by government export policies.