Chief Justice of India (CJI) DY Chandrachud expressed strong disapproval of the increasingly common practice where multiple lawyers, representing the same party, mention the same case before different benches in the Supreme Court. Speaking during a court proceeding, CJI Chandrachud remarked that this behavior not only wastes judicial time but also undermines the efficiency of the court.
The CJI pointed out that the practice causes unnecessary confusion and pressure on the court’s schedule. He emphasized that the legal fraternity should act with greater responsibility and adhere to proper courtroom protocols. Mentioning a case before multiple benches with different advocates does not expedite hearings but instead clogs the system.
His remarks come amidst growing concerns about delays in court proceedings and the misuse of mentioning privileges by lawyers. The Supreme Court has a structured system for urgent cases to be brought before the bench, and CJI Chandrachud urged that this system should be respected without taking shortcuts or bending the rules for tactical advantages.
The statement from the Chief Justice is expected to bring more awareness among the legal community regarding courtroom etiquette and the need to avoid creating bottlenecks in the system.
In recent times, the judiciary has been focusing on reducing case backlogs and ensuring smoother and more efficient functioning of the courts. CJI Chandrachud’s observations are in line with the broader efforts to bring reforms to the judicial process while maintaining the dignity and decorum of court proceedings.
