°C
Air:
GOLD—
SILVER—
USD—
EUR—
GBP—
Senior Lawyers Singhvi and Kapil Sibal Slam ‘Selective Law Enforcement’, Call It Unconstitutional
Delhi

Senior Lawyers Singhvi and Kapil Sibal Slam ‘Selective Law Enforcement’, Call It Unconstitutional

0.0 views
Text Size:

In a sharp critique of the country’s current legal and political landscape, senior advocates Abhishek Manu Singhvi and Kapil Sibal have raised concerns over the selective application of laws , calling it both unconstitutional and dangerous for democracy.

In a sharp critique of the country’s current legal and political landscape, senior advocates Abhishek Manu Singhvi and Kapil Sibal have raised concerns over the selective application of laws, calling it both unconstitutional and dangerous for democracy. The two legal stalwarts emphasized that equality before the law, a fundamental constitutional right, is increasingly under threat.

Speaking at a public legal forum, Singhvi asserted that using the law as a tool to target political opponents or specific individuals goes against the very spirit of the Indian Constitution. He cited recent cases where individuals affiliated with opposition parties were prosecuted swiftly, while others in power appeared to be immune from legal scrutiny.

Kapil Sibal echoed these sentiments, stating that “law cannot be applied selectively; it must be blind to political affiliation, religion, or class.” He added that the misuse or cherry-picking of laws for political advantage amounts to a breach of the statutory framework that governs legal institutions in India.

Both lawyers stressed that the credibility of the judiciary and law enforcement agencies must be upheld by ensuring fairness and neutrality. Singhvi warned that if the public begins to perceive the legal system as biased, it could lead to widespread disillusionment and loss of faith in democratic processes.

Sibal pointed out that in recent years, multiple high-profile arrests and investigations have disproportionately targeted critics of the ruling establishment. He called for judicial oversight and stronger safeguards to prevent the weaponization of law.

Legal scholars attending the discussion supported the concerns raised and urged reforms to strengthen institutional autonomy, including that of investigating agencies like the ED, CBI, and NIA.

As India approaches crucial elections, the debate on judicial independence and lawful governance is expected to gain more traction. Singhvi and Sibal’s comments serve as a wake-up call for policymakers, legal professionals, and citizens alike. 

As India approaches crucial elections, the debate on judicial independence and lawful governance is expected to gain more traction.