Filmmaker Vikram Bhatt has found himself at the centre of renewed controversy after fresh allegations emerged regarding unpaid dues linked to the 2023 horror film 1920. Casting director Parag Chadha has publicly claimed that payments owed to the cast and crew of the film have not been cleared, adding to the legal challenges currently faced by the filmmaker.
The allegations come at a time when Vikram Bhatt and his wife, Shwetambari Bhatt, are dealing with serious legal proceedings. On Saturday, the Rajasthan High Court declined to grant bail to the couple in connection with a Rs 30 crore cheating and criminal breach of trust case. The court’s decision has allowed the investigation to continue, marking a significant setback for the couple.
According to Parag Chadha, several individuals who worked on 1920 are still awaiting remuneration for their services. He has alleged that despite repeated follow ups, payments have not been released, causing financial distress to those involved in the project. The casting director’s claims have sparked discussion within the film industry, particularly around issues of delayed or unpaid compensation.
The 1920 franchise has been a recognisable name in the horror genre, and the 2023 film brought together a new cast and crew under Bhatt’s production banner. However, the latest allegations have cast a shadow over the project’s post release phase. Industry observers note that payment disputes, while not uncommon in the film sector, often raise concerns when they involve multiple workers and remain unresolved for extended periods.
It is important to note that the allegations regarding unpaid dues remain claims at this stage. Vikram Bhatt has not released an official statement responding to the casting director’s assertions. No court ruling has yet been made in relation to the payment dispute linked specifically to the film.
Meanwhile, the separate cheating and breach of trust case continues to progress through the legal system. Investigating authorities are examining financial transactions related to the complaint, which alleges that investors were misled. The High Court’s refusal to grant bail indicates that the court found sufficient grounds to allow further investigation.
The developments have once again highlighted broader issues within the entertainment industry, including transparency in financial dealings and the protection of workers’ rights. Film associations and unions have, in the past, called for stricter enforcement of payment timelines to safeguard technicians, artists, and support staff.
As the legal process unfolds, attention remains on how the filmmaker and his team will address the claims made by the casting director. Any official clarification or legal response could shape the next phase of the controversy.
For now, the allegations and legal proceedings continue independently, with both matters likely to be closely followed by the industry and the public in the coming days.
