Pakistan Army spokesperson Lt Gen Ahmed Sharif Chaudhry is facing intense criticism after a moment from a recent press conference sparked widespread outrage across social media. The controversy emerged after Chaudhry allegedly winked at journalist Absa Komal while responding to her question regarding allegations against former Prime Minister Imran Khan. The gesture, captured on video, quickly went viral and triggered a broader debate on professional conduct and the treatment of women journalists in Pakistan.
During the press briefing, Absa Komal questioned the military spokesperson about the nature of accusations being levelled against Imran Khan, who is currently jailed. Referring to claims that Khan poses a national security threat, is anti-state, and is allegedly acting at the behest of India, she asked how these accusations differed from earlier positions and whether any new developments were expected.
In his reply, Lt Gen Chaudhry reportedly added another remark to the list of allegations, referring to Khan as a “zehni mareez,” a term that translates to “mentally ill.” Following this statement, he smiled and appeared to wink at the journalist, a moment that was immediately shared widely on digital platforms. The gesture drew sharp reactions from journalists, political observers, and social media users, many of whom described it as inappropriate and unprofessional.
Several media professionals expressed concern over what they described as a lack of institutional decorum during official military briefings. Critics argued that such behaviour undermines the seriousness of government communication and reflects poorly on the country’s civil-military discourse. Many also highlighted the gendered nature of the incident, saying that women journalists in Pakistan already face significant professional challenges and should not be subjected to dismissive or patronising behaviour.
Supporters of press freedom pointed out that journalists have a right to ask tough questions without fear of ridicule or intimidation, particularly when matters of national importance are being discussed. Some also criticised the use of language that could be interpreted as personal attacks against political figures rather than factual responses based on verified information.
The Pakistan Army has not issued a formal statement clarifying the incident or responding to the criticism at the time of reporting. However, the controversy has added to the already tense atmosphere surrounding Imran Khan’s arrest, the military’s public narrative, and growing concerns over freedom of expression in the country.
Political analysts note that civil-military relations in Pakistan remain highly sensitive, especially amid continued political instability and public protests linked to Khan’s supporters. Incidents such as this, they say, further complicate the relationship between state institutions, the media, and the public.
The episode has also reignited discussions on the role of military spokespersons in shaping public perception and the importance of maintaining neutrality and professionalism during official interactions. As the video continues to circulate, public pressure is mounting for greater accountability and adherence to ethical standards in official communications.
The incident serves as another reminder of the fragile balance between authority, the media, and public trust in Pakistan’s political landscape.
